<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 109 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433594</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for A.Y. 2011-12 and A.Y. 2013-14. The transfer pricing adjustment for advisory services was deleted, while the disallowance of the provision for slow-moving inventory was also deleted. However, the ad hoc disallowance of travelling and conveyance expenses was upheld. The second substantive ground concerning the restriction of transfer pricing adjustment was not pressed and was rejected accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2023 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=703798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 109 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433594</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for A.Y. 2011-12 and A.Y. 2013-14. The transfer pricing adjustment for advisory services was deleted, while the disallowance of the provision for slow-moving inventory was also deleted. However, the ad hoc disallowance of travelling and conveyance expenses was upheld. The second substantive ground concerning the restriction of transfer pricing adjustment was not pressed and was rejected accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>