<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 257 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31731</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD confirmed the duty demand against the appellant on various grounds. The demand was upheld due to the crossing of the exemption limit in one invoice and findings of clandestine removal. The tribunal remanded certain issues for further examination, including demands with small quantum, enhancement in value after clearance, duty payment post-removal, and penalty determination. The appellant&#039;s submissions were considered, and the tribunal emphasized providing an opportunity for the appellant to present their case. The appeals were disposed of, with all issues kept open for a fresh decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 257 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31731</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD confirmed the duty demand against the appellant on various grounds. The demand was upheld due to the crossing of the exemption limit in one invoice and findings of clandestine removal. The tribunal remanded certain issues for further examination, including demands with small quantum, enhancement in value after clearance, duty payment post-removal, and penalty determination. The appellant&#039;s submissions were considered, and the tribunal emphasized providing an opportunity for the appellant to present their case. The appeals were disposed of, with all issues kept open for a fresh decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>