<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 84 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433569</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals filed by the assessee due to significant delays in filing, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory limitations and providing reasonable explanations for delays. The issue of late fees under Section 234E was not addressed on its merits as the appeals were dismissed based on procedural grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2023 06:31:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=703693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 84 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433569</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals filed by the assessee due to significant delays in filing, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory limitations and providing reasonable explanations for delays. The issue of late fees under Section 234E was not addressed on its merits as the appeals were dismissed based on procedural grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>