<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1341 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306489</link>
    <description>The appeals were allowed, and the late fees charged under section 234E for the financial year 2013-14 were directed to be deleted by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer could not levy late fees under section 234E for periods before 01.06.2015 due to the absence of enabling provisions in section 200A.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2023 06:30:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=703658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1341 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306489</link>
      <description>The appeals were allowed, and the late fees charged under section 234E for the financial year 2013-14 were directed to be deleted by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer could not levy late fees under section 234E for periods before 01.06.2015 due to the absence of enabling provisions in section 200A.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>