<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1734 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306471</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the appellant, directing the deletion of the upward adjustment of Rs. 1,28,41,639/-, the notional interest addition of Rs. 14,49,180/-, and the disallowance of foreign travel expenses amounting to Rs. 27,00,124. The judgment emphasized the importance of functional comparability in transfer pricing and the necessity for specific evidence when disallowing expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2023 08:57:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=703604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1734 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306471</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the appellant, directing the deletion of the upward adjustment of Rs. 1,28,41,639/-, the notional interest addition of Rs. 14,49,180/-, and the disallowance of foreign travel expenses amounting to Rs. 27,00,124. The judgment emphasized the importance of functional comparability in transfer pricing and the necessity for specific evidence when disallowing expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306471</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>