<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1983 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306472</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, ruling that fees imposed under section 234E before 01.06.2015 lacked legal authority and were to be removed. Appeals against section 200A intimations were deemed maintainable, contrary to the CIT(A)&#039;s dismissal. The Tribunal adopted the Karnataka High Court&#039;s stance that adjustments pre-amendment were unauthorized. The decision was rendered on 17/09/2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2023 08:57:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=703597" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1983 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306472</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, ruling that fees imposed under section 234E before 01.06.2015 lacked legal authority and were to be removed. Appeals against section 200A intimations were deemed maintainable, contrary to the CIT(A)&#039;s dismissal. The Tribunal adopted the Karnataka High Court&#039;s stance that adjustments pre-amendment were unauthorized. The decision was rendered on 17/09/2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>