<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 55 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433540</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer (AO) was limited to the issues specified for scrutiny and could not investigate the interest income discrepancy. As a result, the assessment order was not erroneous, despite being prejudicial to the Revenue. The Principal Commissioner&#039;s order under Section 263 was overturned, and the appeal by the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2023 10:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=703590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 55 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433540</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer (AO) was limited to the issues specified for scrutiny and could not investigate the interest income discrepancy. As a result, the assessment order was not erroneous, despite being prejudicial to the Revenue. The Principal Commissioner&#039;s order under Section 263 was overturned, and the appeal by the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>