<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 53 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433538</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the surplus from the sale of properties should be classified as capital gains rather than business income. The decision was based on factors such as the intent of the assessee, the holding period of the properties, and the absence of systematic real estate business activities. The Tribunal instructed the Assessing Officer to remove the disputed addition and accept the capital gains as declared by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2023 08:57:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=703588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 53 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433538</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the surplus from the sale of properties should be classified as capital gains rather than business income. The decision was based on factors such as the intent of the assessee, the holding period of the properties, and the absence of systematic real estate business activities. The Tribunal instructed the Assessing Officer to remove the disputed addition and accept the capital gains as declared by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433538</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>