<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 255 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31710</link>
    <description>The Tribunal deemed computer printouts admissible and reliable when meeting specified conditions and corroborated by other evidence. Procedural flaws in search and seizure led to remanding orders for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the importance of furnishing all relied-upon material to the assessees. The Commissioner was instructed to consider the specified printouts as evidence without additional corroboration. The Tribunal highlighted the significance of complying with statutory requirements in search and seizure operations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 255 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31710</link>
      <description>The Tribunal deemed computer printouts admissible and reliable when meeting specified conditions and corroborated by other evidence. Procedural flaws in search and seizure led to remanding orders for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the importance of furnishing all relied-upon material to the assessees. The Commissioner was instructed to consider the specified printouts as evidence without additional corroboration. The Tribunal highlighted the significance of complying with statutory requirements in search and seizure operations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>