<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 123 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31707</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellants qualified for exemption under Serial No. 212 of Notification 6/2002-Central Excise. The vehicles in question met the conditions specified under Serial No. 212, as the chassis were duty paid and the appellants did not avail credit on them. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the previous order and granting them the benefit of the exemption under Serial No. 212.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 19:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 123 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31707</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellants qualified for exemption under Serial No. 212 of Notification 6/2002-Central Excise. The vehicles in question met the conditions specified under Serial No. 212, as the chassis were duty paid and the appellants did not avail credit on them. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the previous order and granting them the benefit of the exemption under Serial No. 212.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>