<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 120 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31701</link>
    <description>Imported and indigenous goods were examined and cleared through the prescribed procedure with departmental knowledge, including STPI approval and CT-3 certificates, so the exemption assessments attained finality when not challenged by Revenue. On that basis, the goods were not treated as liable to confiscation under Section 111(o) of the Customs Act, 1962. Voluntary payment of duty and interest before the show cause notice, together with the absence of suppression or mala fide intent, also weighed against penalty and redemption fine. Revenue&#039;s challenge to the Commissioner&#039;s refusal to impose confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 120 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31701</link>
      <description>Imported and indigenous goods were examined and cleared through the prescribed procedure with departmental knowledge, including STPI approval and CT-3 certificates, so the exemption assessments attained finality when not challenged by Revenue. On that basis, the goods were not treated as liable to confiscation under Section 111(o) of the Customs Act, 1962. Voluntary payment of duty and interest before the show cause notice, together with the absence of suppression or mala fide intent, also weighed against penalty and redemption fine. Revenue&#039;s challenge to the Commissioner&#039;s refusal to impose confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31701</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>