<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 171 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31697</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order in its entirety, ruling in favor of the Appellant, and allowed the appeal. The demands for duty, interest, and penalty were all overturned, with the Tribunal finding in favor of the Appellant on the interpretation of the Central Excise Act, 1944, calculation of duty, and burden of proof issues raised in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 171 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31697</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order in its entirety, ruling in favor of the Appellant, and allowed the appeal. The demands for duty, interest, and penalty were all overturned, with the Tribunal finding in favor of the Appellant on the interpretation of the Central Excise Act, 1944, calculation of duty, and burden of proof issues raised in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31697</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>