<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 219 - HIGH COURT PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31694</link>
    <description>Annual production capacity of an induction furnace is to be determined primarily from the supplier&#039;s invoice or other documents under Rule 3(1) of the Induction Furnace Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997. Where the invoice is available and states the furnace capacity, sanctioned electricity load and a Chartered Engineer&#039;s certificate cannot be used to substitute a different figure under Rule 3(2), which applies only when the primary documents are unavailable. The document notes that the challenge depended on the authorities&#039; factual finding, and no substantial question of law arose from that finding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70340" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 219 - HIGH COURT PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31694</link>
      <description>Annual production capacity of an induction furnace is to be determined primarily from the supplier&#039;s invoice or other documents under Rule 3(1) of the Induction Furnace Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997. Where the invoice is available and states the furnace capacity, sanctioned electricity load and a Chartered Engineer&#039;s certificate cannot be used to substitute a different figure under Rule 3(2), which applies only when the primary documents are unavailable. The document notes that the challenge depended on the authorities&#039; factual finding, and no substantial question of law arose from that finding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>