<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 210 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31691</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive assessment of duty payments at various stages to determine any excess duty recovery from customers accurately. The judgment highlighted the importance of thorough evaluation in cases involving duty demands under Section 11D and the liability of parties in the manufacturing and supply chain process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 210 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31691</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive assessment of duty payments at various stages to determine any excess duty recovery from customers accurately. The judgment highlighted the importance of thorough evaluation in cases involving duty demands under Section 11D and the liability of parties in the manufacturing and supply chain process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>