https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433501 The Madras HC noted that proceedings under the repealed foreign exchange law were saved by the later enactment, and that the specially constituted adjudicating authority retained jurisdiction to decide alleged contraventions. It also found that the record disclosed adequate opportunity, so there was no violation of natural justice. On writ maintainability, the Court said disputed factual questions and the statutory appellate scheme made appeal the proper forum, with no exceptional ground to bypass Article 226. The writ petitions were therefore not examined on merits, and the parties were left to pursue the statutory appeal remedy with interim and limitation-related directions. en-us Fri, 23 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Jan 2023 10:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433501 The Madras HC noted that proceedings under the repealed foreign exchange law were saved by the later enactment, and that the specially constituted adjudicating authority retained jurisdiction to decide alleged contraventions. It also found that the record disclosed adequate opportunity, so there was no violation of natural justice. On writ maintainability, the Court said disputed factual questions and the statutory appellate scheme made appeal the proper forum, with no exceptional ground to bypass Article 226. The writ petitions were therefore not examined on merits, and the parties were left to pursue the statutory appeal remedy with interim and limitation-related directions. Case-Laws FEMA Fri, 23 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433501