<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1341 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306462</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Central Public Information Officer&#039;s order regarding the Right to Information Act application. Despite the Central Information Commission deeming the information provided as sufficient, the Petitioner argued that the search report was inaccurate due to the order of incorporation of &#039;World Book Company Private Limited&#039;. The High Court emphasized the importance of thorough searches before company registration, detailed the incorporation timelines, and instructed the Petitioner to proceed with their legal proceedings under the Trademark Act and Passing off. No further orders were issued, and the parties were directed to continue their contentions in the ongoing legal suit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2023 21:07:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=703193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1341 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306462</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Central Public Information Officer&#039;s order regarding the Right to Information Act application. Despite the Central Information Commission deeming the information provided as sufficient, the Petitioner argued that the search report was inaccurate due to the order of incorporation of &#039;World Book Company Private Limited&#039;. The High Court emphasized the importance of thorough searches before company registration, detailed the incorporation timelines, and instructed the Petitioner to proceed with their legal proceedings under the Trademark Act and Passing off. No further orders were issued, and the parties were directed to continue their contentions in the ongoing legal suit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>