<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 1369 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306459</link>
    <description>The court set aside the termination order and remanded the matter for reconsideration of the punishment within twelve weeks. The court found the punishment disproportionate and lacking proper consideration, emphasizing the non-speaking nature of the orders and the absence of financial loss. The court invoked its powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in the interest of justice, considering the petitioner&#039;s age and the time elapsed since the incident.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2023 21:07:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=703190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 1369 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306459</link>
      <description>The court set aside the termination order and remanded the matter for reconsideration of the punishment within twelve weeks. The court found the punishment disproportionate and lacking proper consideration, emphasizing the non-speaking nature of the orders and the absence of financial loss. The court invoked its powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in the interest of justice, considering the petitioner&#039;s age and the time elapsed since the incident.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>