<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 31 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31669</link>
    <description>An appeal before CESTAT was dismissed for non-prosecution because the appellant did not appear despite notice and made no application for adjournment. The Tribunal recorded that the appellant appeared unwilling to proceed with the matter, so the appeal could not be pursued and was dismissed on that procedural ground.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 31 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31669</link>
      <description>An appeal before CESTAT was dismissed for non-prosecution because the appellant did not appear despite notice and made no application for adjournment. The Tribunal recorded that the appellant appeared unwilling to proceed with the matter, so the appeal could not be pursued and was dismissed on that procedural ground.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31669</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>