<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 1219 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433472</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the Revenue lacked substantive corroborative evidence linking unaccounted credits to the assessee, leading to the deletion of additions made by the AO. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of concrete evidence over mere probability and upheld the appeals for multiple assessment years. The decision, issued on 25/01/2023, provided relief to the assessee by overturning the additions based on insufficient grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2023 08:39:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=703120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 1219 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433472</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the Revenue lacked substantive corroborative evidence linking unaccounted credits to the assessee, leading to the deletion of additions made by the AO. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of concrete evidence over mere probability and upheld the appeals for multiple assessment years. The decision, issued on 25/01/2023, provided relief to the assessee by overturning the additions based on insufficient grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>