<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 26 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31664</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant was not liable to pay service tax for engineering consultancy services received from foreign companies before 1.1.2005, as per Rule 2(1)(d)(iv) and the precedent set by the Larger Bench decision in M/s. Hindustan Zinc Ltd. vs. CCE, Jaipur. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, granting consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 15:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 26 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31664</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant was not liable to pay service tax for engineering consultancy services received from foreign companies before 1.1.2005, as per Rule 2(1)(d)(iv) and the precedent set by the Larger Bench decision in M/s. Hindustan Zinc Ltd. vs. CCE, Jaipur. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, granting consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>