<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 1203 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433456</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal of the assessee concerning the excess interest charged under Section 234C of the Act. The Tribunal found that the CIT (A) failed to consider the uncertainty regarding performance fees based on stock market conditions, leading to an unjustified decision. The issue related to excess interest under Section 234B was dismissed as it became irrelevant after the decision on Section 234C.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2023 08:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=703098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 1203 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433456</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal of the assessee concerning the excess interest charged under Section 234C of the Act. The Tribunal found that the CIT (A) failed to consider the uncertainty regarding performance fees based on stock market conditions, leading to an unjustified decision. The issue related to excess interest under Section 234B was dismissed as it became irrelevant after the decision on Section 234C.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>