https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31662 The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the Bombay High Court in Wockhardt Hospital and Bombay Hospital, confirming the binding nature of those decisions. It determined that obligations under Notification No. 64/88 are continuous even after rescission, supported by relevant case law. Duty demands were deemed sustainable even without specific mention in show cause notices, and retrospective cancellation of Customs Duty Exemption Certificates (CDECs) was permitted. Charging a registration fee was considered a breach of notification conditions, and treatment in free camps was excluded from the calculation of free treatment limits. Individual appeals were addressed based on specific circumstances, with some cases remanded for further review. en-us Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31662 The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the Bombay High Court in Wockhardt Hospital and Bombay Hospital, confirming the binding nature of those decisions. It determined that obligations under Notification No. 64/88 are continuous even after rescission, supported by relevant case law. Duty demands were deemed sustainable even without specific mention in show cause notices, and retrospective cancellation of Customs Duty Exemption Certificates (CDECs) was permitted. Charging a registration fee was considered a breach of notification conditions, and treatment in free camps was excluded from the calculation of free treatment limits. Individual appeals were addressed based on specific circumstances, with some cases remanded for further review. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31662