https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433439 The court found that the Respondents failed to provide meaningful reasons for rejection under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Disputes Resolution) Scheme, 2019, leading to unnecessary litigation. Consequently, the court quashed the impugned orders/communications and directed the Respondents to provide discernible reasons in Form SVLDRS-3. If immediate issuance was not feasible, the Respondents were allowed to pass a separate order with reasons within eight weeks. This decision aimed to uphold administrative discipline and ensure compliance with the statutory requirement of providing reasons for rejection, emphasizing the importance of transparency in the resolution process. en-us Wed, 11 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Jan 2023 07:56:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433439 The court found that the Respondents failed to provide meaningful reasons for rejection under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Disputes Resolution) Scheme, 2019, leading to unnecessary litigation. Consequently, the court quashed the impugned orders/communications and directed the Respondents to provide discernible reasons in Form SVLDRS-3. If immediate issuance was not feasible, the Respondents were allowed to pass a separate order with reasons within eight weeks. This decision aimed to uphold administrative discipline and ensure compliance with the statutory requirement of providing reasons for rejection, emphasizing the importance of transparency in the resolution process. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 11 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433439