<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Delay in Refund Process Lies with Respondents, Not Petitioner; Interest Must Be Paid.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=67966</link>
    <description>Interest on the refund amount - The contention that the petitioner is guilty of inaction for an inordinately long period is also unpersuasive. - Once the petitioner had filed the application for seeking refund of the amount along with interest, it was incumbent upon the respondents to either allow or reject the same as per law. The inaction, if any, is largely on the part of the respondents. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2023 07:56:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2023 07:56:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=703069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Delay in Refund Process Lies with Respondents, Not Petitioner; Interest Must Be Paid.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=67966</link>
      <description>Interest on the refund amount - The contention that the petitioner is guilty of inaction for an inordinately long period is also unpersuasive. - Once the petitioner had filed the application for seeking refund of the amount along with interest, it was incumbent upon the respondents to either allow or reject the same as per law. The inaction, if any, is largely on the part of the respondents. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2023 07:56:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=67966</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>