https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306431 Abatement of proceedings under the repealed SICA regime is governed by the amended consequential provision in the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Repeal Act, 2003, rendering the application before the Adjudicating Authority non-maintainable in line with the binding principle in Spartek Ceramics. A special leave petition dismissed as withdrawn does not create a binding bar against pursuing an available writ remedy. The earlier writ petition consequently stands revived before the High Court, with liberty to seek amendment within the stipulated period. en-us Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Jan 2023 21:19:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306431 Abatement of proceedings under the repealed SICA regime is governed by the amended consequential provision in the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Repeal Act, 2003, rendering the application before the Adjudicating Authority non-maintainable in line with the binding principle in Spartek Ceramics. A special leave petition dismissed as withdrawn does not create a binding bar against pursuing an available writ remedy. The earlier writ petition consequently stands revived before the High Court, with liberty to seek amendment within the stipulated period. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306431