https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306431 Proceedings abated under the repealed SICA regime are governed by the amended consequential provision in section 4(b) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Repeal Act, 2003, and the article notes that this supported the view that the Adjudicating Authority's finding of non-maintainability should not be interfered with in light of Spartek Ceramics. It also states that a special leave petition dismissed as withdrawn is non-binding and does not prevent revival of an earlier writ petition before the High Court where liberty to amend was reserved within the time granted. en-us Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Jan 2023 21:19:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306431 Proceedings abated under the repealed SICA regime are governed by the amended consequential provision in section 4(b) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Repeal Act, 2003, and the article notes that this supported the view that the Adjudicating Authority's finding of non-maintainability should not be interfered with in light of Spartek Ceramics. It also states that a special leave petition dismissed as withdrawn is non-binding and does not prevent revival of an earlier writ petition before the High Court where liberty to amend was reserved within the time granted. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306431