<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 2112 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306440</link>
    <description>The petitioner successfully sought a refund of Rs. 65,90,794 with interest, which was paid as a pre-deposit for an appellate remedy. The court directed the respondents to process the refund within three weeks from the date of the order, resulting in the allowance of the writ petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2023 21:19:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=703054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 2112 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306440</link>
      <description>The petitioner successfully sought a refund of Rs. 65,90,794 with interest, which was paid as a pre-deposit for an appellate remedy. The court directed the respondents to process the refund within three weeks from the date of the order, resulting in the allowance of the writ petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>