<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1500 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306444</link>
    <description>No interim relief was granted, and the respondents were directed to file an affidavit-in-opposition within four weeks, with the petitioner permitted to file an affidavit-in-reply within two weeks thereafter. The matter was listed for final hearing after seven weeks, with both sides to file short written notes of argument. The court also directed that the pendency of the petition would not prevent the respondents from proceeding in the matter in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 11:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=703051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1500 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306444</link>
      <description>No interim relief was granted, and the respondents were directed to file an affidavit-in-opposition within four weeks, with the petitioner permitted to file an affidavit-in-reply within two weeks thereafter. The matter was listed for final hearing after seven weeks, with both sides to file short written notes of argument. The court also directed that the pendency of the petition would not prevent the respondents from proceeding in the matter in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>