<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 70 - HIGH COURT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31659</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the impugned orders dated 25.07.2000 and 03.06.2005 by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal due to discrepancies and tampering with judicial records. The matter was remanded to the Tribunal for fresh consideration, emphasizing the importance of upholding judicial integrity. The Tribunal was directed to expedite the hearing and dispose of the appeal within three months, taking into account a previous case with similar circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 70 - HIGH COURT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31659</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the impugned orders dated 25.07.2000 and 03.06.2005 by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal due to discrepancies and tampering with judicial records. The matter was remanded to the Tribunal for fresh consideration, emphasizing the importance of upholding judicial integrity. The Tribunal was directed to expedite the hearing and dispose of the appeal within three months, taking into account a previous case with similar circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>