<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 1157 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433410</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer under the head of capital gain. It clarified that the correct taxation of capital gains or business receipts should be determined based on ownership of the capital asset and not on the basis of proceeds credited to a third party or attorney.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2023 09:03:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 1157 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433410</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer under the head of capital gain. It clarified that the correct taxation of capital gains or business receipts should be determined based on ownership of the capital asset and not on the basis of proceeds credited to a third party or attorney.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>