<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 1132 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433385</link>
    <description>In a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the accused may invoke Section 91 of the CrPC to summon Income Tax records, including the complainant&#039;s returns, balance sheets and supporting material, where those documents are sought to test the genuineness of the complainant&#039;s financial claims. Section 91 is not confined to documents relied on by the prosecution, and the accused remains entitled to lead defence evidence and rebut the statutory presumption on a preponderance of probability. The finality attached to orders under Section 138(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act does not limit the court&#039;s power to require relevant records. On these principles, refusal to summon the records was unsustainable and the application ought to have been allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2023 09:01:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 1132 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433385</link>
      <description>In a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the accused may invoke Section 91 of the CrPC to summon Income Tax records, including the complainant&#039;s returns, balance sheets and supporting material, where those documents are sought to test the genuineness of the complainant&#039;s financial claims. Section 91 is not confined to documents relied on by the prosecution, and the accused remains entitled to lead defence evidence and rebut the statutory presumption on a preponderance of probability. The finality attached to orders under Section 138(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act does not limit the court&#039;s power to require relevant records. On these principles, refusal to summon the records was unsustainable and the application ought to have been allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>