<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 117 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31650</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting consequential relief to the appellant. It held that the brown sugar left over at the end of the crushing season, requiring substantial processing before being marketed, cannot be considered excisable until reaching a marketable stage. The Tribunal emphasized the high molasses content in the brown sugar, its non-marketable condition, and the need for further processing to become VP sugar. It concluded that the brown sugar, in its current state, cannot be classified as sugar, in line with precedents cited by the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 117 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31650</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting consequential relief to the appellant. It held that the brown sugar left over at the end of the crushing season, requiring substantial processing before being marketed, cannot be considered excisable until reaching a marketable stage. The Tribunal emphasized the high molasses content in the brown sugar, its non-marketable condition, and the need for further processing to become VP sugar. It concluded that the brown sugar, in its current state, cannot be classified as sugar, in line with precedents cited by the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>