<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 1116 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433369</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed both appeals of the assessee for assessment years 2004-05 and 2005-06. The appeals were allowed based on the lack of justification for the addition made on account of unexplained investments, as there were no corresponding assets materialized from the alleged cash payments. The tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and allowed the grounds raised by the assessee, ultimately allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2023 08:26:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 1116 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433369</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed both appeals of the assessee for assessment years 2004-05 and 2005-06. The appeals were allowed based on the lack of justification for the addition made on account of unexplained investments, as there were no corresponding assets materialized from the alleged cash payments. The tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and allowed the grounds raised by the assessee, ultimately allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>