https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306397 Non-supply of the inquiry report before imposition of punishment was argued to vitiate the termination order, but the governing principle was applied prospectively. Because the relevant decision had been given prospective effect, orders passed before 29 November 1990 were not invalidated on this ground. The termination order was therefore not vitiated for non-supply of the inquiry report, and the challenge failed. en-us Wed, 06 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Jan 2023 11:23:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306397 Non-supply of the inquiry report before imposition of punishment was argued to vitiate the termination order, but the governing principle was applied prospectively. Because the relevant decision had been given prospective effect, orders passed before 29 November 1990 were not invalidated on this ground. The termination order was therefore not vitiated for non-supply of the inquiry report, and the challenge failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 06 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306397