https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306396 The Court reiterated that the rule in Mohd. Ramzan Khan on supplying the inquiry report before imposing punishment operated prospectively, so it could not be applied to a dismissal order made before that judgment. The High Court therefore erred in setting aside the dismissal solely on that basis without examining the other grounds raised in the writ petition. The prospective character of the earlier ruling remained intact, and reliance on it to invalidate the prior dismissal was unsustainable. en-us Wed, 17 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Jan 2023 11:10:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306396 The Court reiterated that the rule in Mohd. Ramzan Khan on supplying the inquiry report before imposing punishment operated prospectively, so it could not be applied to a dismissal order made before that judgment. The High Court therefore erred in setting aside the dismissal solely on that basis without examining the other grounds raised in the writ petition. The prospective character of the earlier ruling remained intact, and reliance on it to invalidate the prior dismissal was unsustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 17 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306396