https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433349 In proceedings arising from summons under the CGST Act and the IPC, the applicant sought confirmation of interim anticipatory bail. The applicant relied on the pendency of proceedings under section 74 of the CGST Act and on his cooperation with the enquiry without misuse of the interim protection, and the State did not dispute those facts. On that basis, the interim anticipatory bail order was made absolute until finalisation of the proceedings, and the anticipatory bail application was allowed. en-us Thu, 19 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 Apr 2025 11:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433349 In proceedings arising from summons under the CGST Act and the IPC, the applicant sought confirmation of interim anticipatory bail. The applicant relied on the pendency of proceedings under section 74 of the CGST Act and on his cooperation with the enquiry without misuse of the interim protection, and the State did not dispute those facts. On that basis, the interim anticipatory bail order was made absolute until finalisation of the proceedings, and the anticipatory bail application was allowed. Case-Laws GST Thu, 19 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433349