<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 24 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31636</link>
    <description>Imported garlic found infected with fungus was not permitted to be cleared for consumption because the material before the SC showed that methyl bromide fumigation was not an effective treatment for such infection and was mainly intended for insects and pests. Given the risk to human health and Indian agriculture, the earlier direction for fumigation and release was rejected. The goods were ordered to be transported from the Customs Warehouse for destruction and destroyed by fire in the presence of an authorised officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 11:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 24 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31636</link>
      <description>Imported garlic found infected with fungus was not permitted to be cleared for consumption because the material before the SC showed that methyl bromide fumigation was not an effective treatment for such infection and was mainly intended for insects and pests. Given the risk to human health and Indian agriculture, the earlier direction for fumigation and release was rejected. The goods were ordered to be transported from the Customs Warehouse for destruction and destroyed by fire in the presence of an authorised officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>