<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 23 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31635</link>
    <description>SC set aside the CEGAT judgments and remitted the appeals to CESTAT for fresh consideration by an appropriate Bench, holding that CEGAT improperly disposed of matters by mere reference to precedents and by clubbing cases without detailed factual and article-by-article analysis. The court found CEGAT failed to address relevance of relied authorities and special features of each case. Because of the remand, SC declined to answer the reference and disposed of the appeals accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2025 17:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 23 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31635</link>
      <description>SC set aside the CEGAT judgments and remitted the appeals to CESTAT for fresh consideration by an appropriate Bench, holding that CEGAT improperly disposed of matters by mere reference to precedents and by clubbing cases without detailed factual and article-by-article analysis. The court found CEGAT failed to address relevance of relied authorities and special features of each case. Because of the remand, SC declined to answer the reference and disposed of the appeals accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>