<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 1044 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433297</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellant re-credit/refund of the excess amount reversed under Rule 6(3)(i) of Cenvat Credit Rules. The decision was based on the correct application of Rule 11(3), distinguishing it from the Circular cited by the Revenue. The Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s right to seek re-credit/refund, emphasizing the procedural nature of availing options under Rule 6(3).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2023 08:31:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 1044 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433297</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellant re-credit/refund of the excess amount reversed under Rule 6(3)(i) of Cenvat Credit Rules. The decision was based on the correct application of Rule 11(3), distinguishing it from the Circular cited by the Revenue. The Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s right to seek re-credit/refund, emphasizing the procedural nature of availing options under Rule 6(3).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>