https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433294 The Allahabad High Court, in a judgment by Hon'ble Manish Mathur, J., addressed a case involving a two-year delay in filing a revision application. The revisionist failed to provide a valid justification for the delay, despite citing judgments supporting their argument. Citing precedents like Postmaster General v. Living Media and Central Tibetan Schools, the Court emphasized the need for government entities to adhere to limitation statutes and not expect leniency in delay condonation. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application for condonation of delay and the revision itself, in line with the principles outlined in the referenced judgments. en-us Thu, 19 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Jan 2023 10:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433294 The Allahabad High Court, in a judgment by Hon'ble Manish Mathur, J., addressed a case involving a two-year delay in filing a revision application. The revisionist failed to provide a valid justification for the delay, despite citing judgments supporting their argument. Citing precedents like Postmaster General v. Living Media and Central Tibetan Schools, the Court emphasized the need for government entities to adhere to limitation statutes and not expect leniency in delay condonation. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application for condonation of delay and the revision itself, in line with the principles outlined in the referenced judgments. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 19 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433294