https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31632 Omission of the parent charging provision without a saving clause deprived the adjudicating authority of jurisdiction to pass a later de novo order redetermining annual production capacity. The authority could not rely on a remand order alone once the statutory source of power had disappeared, and pending proceedings could not continue after unconditional omission of the provision. The annual capacity determination rules used for the impugned order were also noted to have been struck down as ultra vires, reinforcing that the order lacked a valid legal foundation and could not be sustained. en-us Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Oct 2019 16:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31632 Omission of the parent charging provision without a saving clause deprived the adjudicating authority of jurisdiction to pass a later de novo order redetermining annual production capacity. The authority could not rely on a remand order alone once the statutory source of power had disappeared, and pending proceedings could not continue after unconditional omission of the provision. The annual capacity determination rules used for the impugned order were also noted to have been struck down as ultra vires, reinforcing that the order lacked a valid legal foundation and could not be sustained. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31632