https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306394 An arbitration clause must be read according to its clear and unambiguous wording; where it is limited to interpretation of the agreement, it does not extend to a suit for recovery of possession and mesne profits. The dispute therefore fell outside the clause's scope, so reference to arbitration was properly refused under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Supervisory interference under Article 227 was also unwarranted because the lower court had applied the plain contractual language correctly. The objection under Section 8(2) regarding non-filing of the original or certified arbitration agreement was also noted. en-us Thu, 12 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Jan 2023 17:55:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306394 An arbitration clause must be read according to its clear and unambiguous wording; where it is limited to interpretation of the agreement, it does not extend to a suit for recovery of possession and mesne profits. The dispute therefore fell outside the clause's scope, so reference to arbitration was properly refused under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Supervisory interference under Article 227 was also unwarranted because the lower court had applied the plain contractual language correctly. The objection under Section 8(2) regarding non-filing of the original or certified arbitration agreement was also noted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 12 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306394