<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 1149 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306395</link>
    <description>The taxpayer&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the transfer pricing adjustment in light of the Advance Pricing Agreement (APA), treat software expenses as revenue expenses based on previous decisions, and comply with the Dispute Resolution Panel&#039;s specific directions. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of minimizing litigation and ensuring compliance with established decisions and guidelines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2023 10:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 1149 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306395</link>
      <description>The taxpayer&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the transfer pricing adjustment in light of the Advance Pricing Agreement (APA), treat software expenses as revenue expenses based on previous decisions, and comply with the Dispute Resolution Panel&#039;s specific directions. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of minimizing litigation and ensuring compliance with established decisions and guidelines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>