<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1422 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306383</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed all tax case appeals, upholding decisions on the reopening of assessments under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act and the claim related to broken period interest. The court emphasized the requirement for tangible material and a valid basis for reassessment, highlighting that mere changes of opinion without fresh material do not justify reopening assessments. The court ruled that the reassessment lacked jurisdiction under Section 147, as it was based on a mere change of opinion without new evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2023 08:32:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1422 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306383</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed all tax case appeals, upholding decisions on the reopening of assessments under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act and the claim related to broken period interest. The court emphasized the requirement for tangible material and a valid basis for reassessment, highlighting that mere changes of opinion without fresh material do not justify reopening assessments. The court ruled that the reassessment lacked jurisdiction under Section 147, as it was based on a mere change of opinion without new evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>