<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 1033 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433286</link>
    <description>ITAT, Mumbai upheld an addition under section 56(2)(viib) where four resident allottees paid excess consideration over the DCF-based fair market value of Rs.341 per share; one non-resident allottee was excluded from the provision. The Tribunal found no dispute on the valuation report and treated the excess receipt (Rs.59 per share) as income from other sources for the closely held company. The assessment and appellate orders were sustained and the assessee&#039;s grounds were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2025 11:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702733" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 1033 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433286</link>
      <description>ITAT, Mumbai upheld an addition under section 56(2)(viib) where four resident allottees paid excess consideration over the DCF-based fair market value of Rs.341 per share; one non-resident allottee was excluded from the provision. The Tribunal found no dispute on the valuation report and treated the excess receipt (Rs.59 per share) as income from other sources for the closely held company. The assessment and appellate orders were sustained and the assessee&#039;s grounds were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>