<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 250 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31625</link>
    <description>Declared transaction value for old and used imported machinery may be rejected where it is found unreliable, but enhancement to a contemporaneous import value cannot be applied mechanically. A comparison with allegedly identical goods must account for differences in year of manufacture, age, usage and technological features, and the valuation must be supported by reasoned evidence. The chartered engineer&#039;s certificate and depreciation guidance for old machinery were accepted as relevant, leading to a depreciated assessable value above the declared value but below the enhanced figure adopted below. Differential duty remained recoverable on the reassessed value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 250 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31625</link>
      <description>Declared transaction value for old and used imported machinery may be rejected where it is found unreliable, but enhancement to a contemporaneous import value cannot be applied mechanically. A comparison with allegedly identical goods must account for differences in year of manufacture, age, usage and technological features, and the valuation must be supported by reasoned evidence. The chartered engineer&#039;s certificate and depreciation guidance for old machinery were accepted as relevant, leading to a depreciated assessable value above the declared value but below the enhanced figure adopted below. Differential duty remained recoverable on the reassessed value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>