<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 1014 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433267</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the jurisdiction of the ld. PCIT under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, confirming the taxability of share premium under section 56(2)(viib). However, it rejected the directive to initiate penalty proceedings under section 271F, ruling that such proceedings should be based on the Assessing Officer&#039;s satisfaction and not solely on higher authorities&#039; directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2023 08:31:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702708" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 1014 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433267</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the jurisdiction of the ld. PCIT under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, confirming the taxability of share premium under section 56(2)(viib). However, it rejected the directive to initiate penalty proceedings under section 271F, ruling that such proceedings should be based on the Assessing Officer&#039;s satisfaction and not solely on higher authorities&#039; directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>