<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 212 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31623</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed two Revenue appeals as infructuous, rejected an appeal by M/s. Tensile Wire Mfg. Company, and allowed an appeal by M/s. Orion Steel Corporation by setting aside the interest confirmation. The judgment clarified the application of unjust enrichment principles, upheld the decision on refund claims, and determined interest liability based on the timeline of repayments post-appellate decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 212 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31623</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed two Revenue appeals as infructuous, rejected an appeal by M/s. Tensile Wire Mfg. Company, and allowed an appeal by M/s. Orion Steel Corporation by setting aside the interest confirmation. The judgment clarified the application of unjust enrichment principles, upheld the decision on refund claims, and determined interest liability based on the timeline of repayments post-appellate decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>