<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Hawala Transactions: No Merit in Differential Tax Treatment for Unexplained Transactions, All Found at Par with Explained Ones.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=67899</link>
    <description>Unexplained Hawala Transactions - the various reasons cited in the beginning of this paragraph clearly reveal that all transactions were at par. Being so, we do not find any merit in the claim of revenue that the so-called “unexplained transactions” should be accorded a different treatment than the “explained transactions”. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2023 08:30:31 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2023 08:30:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Hawala Transactions: No Merit in Differential Tax Treatment for Unexplained Transactions, All Found at Par with Explained Ones.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=67899</link>
      <description>Unexplained Hawala Transactions - the various reasons cited in the beginning of this paragraph clearly reveal that all transactions were at par. Being so, we do not find any merit in the claim of revenue that the so-called “unexplained transactions” should be accorded a different treatment than the “explained transactions”. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2023 08:30:31 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=67899</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>