<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 1000 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433253</link>
    <description>Inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC cannot be used to quash criminal proceedings where the allegations disclose serious triable issues and disputed questions of fact requiring investigation or trial. Here, the alleged manipulation of RFID e-seals for export cargo, including disabling tamper alerts and allowing faulty seals to pass customs checks, was supported by investigation material and statements indicating board-level knowledge. Because the record raised serious factual disputes and prima facie involvement, the Court held that evidence could not be weighed at the quashing stage and declined to quash the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2023 11:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 1000 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433253</link>
      <description>Inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC cannot be used to quash criminal proceedings where the allegations disclose serious triable issues and disputed questions of fact requiring investigation or trial. Here, the alleged manipulation of RFID e-seals for export cargo, including disabling tamper alerts and allowing faulty seals to pass customs checks, was supported by investigation material and statements indicating board-level knowledge. Because the record raised serious factual disputes and prima facie involvement, the Court held that evidence could not be weighed at the quashing stage and declined to quash the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>