<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 994 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433247</link>
    <description>SC dismissed the appeal and upheld that the appellant (a marketing committee) is liable for service tax on renting/leasing activity under the Finance Act provisions and relevant service definitions; the Tribunal&#039;s finding that service tax was payable at the relevant time was affirmed and no interference was warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2025 15:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 994 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433247</link>
      <description>SC dismissed the appeal and upheld that the appellant (a marketing committee) is liable for service tax on renting/leasing activity under the Finance Act provisions and relevant service definitions; the Tribunal&#039;s finding that service tax was payable at the relevant time was affirmed and no interference was warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>